Troublemakers and terrorists
In case we should
have mass protests, with street demonstrations,
shouting, placards and slogans, we have also taken precautions.
Did you notice the
recent confrontations between the demonstrators
and the forces of law and order on different occasions? Who is the
one who always wins and proves himself every time to be better
organized and more efficient?
protesters maintain their tactics
unchanged and still use the means
available to Neanderthal man:
mostly loud shouts, sticks and stones.
Can you prevail
with these means against an organized,
trained and equipped army, whose arsenal of conventional,
mechanical, chemical and other (even psychological)
resources is daily growing?
In the next clash,
the forces of law and order will be even
more impressive and effective. As each confrontation is for
them an exercise which builds up its military clout.
Really, how are these conflicts caused?
and important persons want to meet somewhere,
exchange a few words and maybe have a quiet drink.
And the ungrateful
mob, though it should know
that they work hard for its wellbeing, gathers outside,
makes a racket, doesn't let them think in peace and spoils
their appetite, if not their digestion.
But I wonder. Why are these meetings necessary?
secretaries thoroughly edited everything and already
discussed the slightest detail?
telecommunication facilities, if eight (or eighty, it is the
same thing) important people want to communicate with each other,
must they wait a year to be in the same room together?
Don't they have phones?
Don't they communicate daily with image and sound?
Don't they exchange fax and e-mails incessantly?
Don't they use video conferencing?
Do they really need to be in the same room to communicate with each other?
Why should they meet anyway?
Is it to cause riots, to break windows and open heads?
Unless of course the riots have their usefulness and therefore are welcome.
On the one hand
the security forces exercise in real action, each time
testing the effectiveness of their new weapons and their advanced strategy,
and on the other hand the rioters are taught that they have no hope of
In the event that
the protesters are stupid enough to use force,
we have also made provision for some time.
have explained systematically for years
(long before the providential 9. 11. 2001),
and all mankind believes it, that there is no
greater threat than terrorism.
So we have the
right to remove immediately anyone who opposes
us in this way, if needed by a drone attack of surgical accuracy.
the fact that terrorist attacks
are doing nothing but good to us and therefore,
by dynamite has no chance.
He is condemned as
isolated and completely eliminated.
If the opposition
starts to become even louder,
say at state level, then we will send the B-2s,
we offer them a humanitarian bombing and we have
all the benefits seen so far from the liberation wars.